DiscoverThe Ezra Klein ShowThe V.P. Debate Came Down to One Moment
The V.P. Debate Came Down to One Moment

The V.P. Debate Came Down to One Moment

Update: 2024-10-026
Share

Digest

This podcast delves into the vice presidential debate between Tim Kaine and Mike Pence, analyzing the candidates' performances and the significance of the vice presidency. It then explores JD Vance's political ideology, focusing on his stance on the 2020 election, his counter-revolutionary project, and his views on reshoring manufacturing and climate change. The podcast also examines the role of money in the 2024 election, highlighting the importance of campaign finance reports. The discussion then shifts to a comparison of the economic policies of the Biden-Harris administration and the Trump-Vance ticket, analyzing their positions on manufacturing, trade with China, and the role of unions. The podcast also explores the candidates' stances on immigration policy, healthcare policy, paid family leave, and childcare, highlighting key differences in their approaches. Finally, the podcast examines the Republican Party's pro-family agenda, analyzing JD Vance's comments on the challenges faced by working mothers and his support for a family care model that promotes choice. It questions whether the Republican Party is truly committed to this agenda and discusses the influence of groups like American Compass on Vance's thinking.

Outlines

00:00:30
Vice Presidential Debate Analysis and the Significance of the Vice Presidency

Ezra Klein analyzes the vice presidential debate between Tim Kaine and Mike Pence, focusing on the debate's format, the candidates' performances, and the significance of the vice presidency. He argues that JD Vance is a better debater than Tim Walls, but that Walls did not hurt the ticket. Klein also discusses the importance of the vice president's role in certifying election results, particularly in light of the 2020 election.

00:08:04
JD Vance's Counter-Revolutionary Project and His Views on American Institutions

Ezra Klein and Claire Gordon discuss JD Vance's stance on the 2020 election and his potential role as a counter-revolutionary figure. They analyze Vance's comments on climate change and his focus on reshoring manufacturing. Gordon argues that Vance's ideology is rooted in a belief that American institutions have been captured by \"godless, liberal, woke, Marxist, enemies of the people.\"

00:16:20
Money in Politics and the 2024 Election: Analyzing Campaign Finance Reports

Shane Goldmacher, a National Political Correspondent for the New York Times, discusses the role of money in the 2024 election. He highlights the importance of analyzing campaign finance reports to understand the dynamics of the race. Goldmacher emphasizes the New York Times' commitment to providing comprehensive and insightful coverage of the election.

00:17:33
The Convergence and Divergence of Economic Policies: Biden-Harris vs. Trump-Vance

Ezra Klein and Claire Gordon discuss the convergence of economic policies between the Biden-Harris administration and the Trump-Vance ticket. They analyze the candidates' positions on manufacturing, trade with China, and the role of unions. Gordon argues that both campaigns are prioritizing bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US, despite their differences on other issues.

00:26:37
Immigration Policy and the Trump-Vance Ticket: Deportation, Employer Crackdowns, and Family Separation

Ezra Klein and Claire Gordon discuss JD Vance's comments on immigration policy during the debate. They analyze Vance's proposals for deporting undocumented immigrants with criminal records and cracking down on employers who hire undocumented workers. Klein expresses skepticism about Vance's claims about the impact of immigration on housing costs and his avoidance of the issue of family separation.

00:38:55
Healthcare Policy and the Trump-Vance Ticket: Obamacare, Discrimination, and Healthcare Reform

Ezra Klein and Claire Gordon discuss JD Vance's comments on healthcare policy during the debate. They analyze Vance's claims that Donald Trump saved Obamacare and his support for a system that would discriminate between healthy and sick people. Klein argues that Vance's proposals are based on discredited ideas and that a second Trump administration would likely not prioritize healthcare reform.

00:44:18
Paid Family Leave and Childcare: Comparing the Policies of Harris and Vance

Ezra Klein and Claire Gordon discuss Tim Walls' comments on paid family leave and childcare during the debate. They analyze Walls' support for a federal program and his belief that it would enhance the workforce and families. Klein questions whether a Harris administration would prioritize this issue and discusses the lack of clarity in Harris's economic agenda.

00:48:12
The Republican Party's Pro-Family Agenda: Choice, Flexibility, and the Influence of American Compass

Ezra Klein and Claire Gordon discuss JD Vance's attempt to portray the Republican Party as a pro-family party. They analyze Vance's comments on the challenges faced by working mothers and his support for a family care model that promotes choice. Klein questions whether the Republican Party is truly committed to this agenda and discusses the influence of groups like American Compass on Vance's thinking.

Keywords

Counter-revolutionary


A counter-revolutionary is a person who opposes a revolution or radical change, often seeking to restore a previous political or social order. In this context, it refers to JD Vance's belief that American institutions need to be taken over and returned to a more traditional, conservative state.

Reshoring Manufacturing


Reshoring manufacturing refers to the practice of bringing manufacturing operations back to a company's home country from overseas locations. In this context, it is presented as a solution to climate change by reducing carbon emissions associated with global supply chains.

American Compass


American Compass is a conservative think tank that advocates for a more nationalist and protectionist economic policy. They argue for policies that promote American manufacturing, reduce reliance on China, and strengthen the role of unions.

Family Care Model


A family care model refers to a system of policies and programs that support families in caring for their children and other dependents. In this context, it is presented as a way to promote choice and flexibility for families, particularly in terms of childcare and paid family leave.

Natalist


Natalist policies are government policies that encourage people to have more children. In this context, it refers to the possibility of the Republican Party becoming more supportive of policies that promote family formation and childbearing.

Campaign Finance Reports


Campaign finance reports are documents that disclose the sources of funding and expenditures for political campaigns. Analyzing these reports can provide insights into the dynamics of an election and the influence of special interests.

Vice Presidential Debate


A vice presidential debate is a televised event where the candidates for vice president of the United States engage in a formal discussion of their positions on various issues. These debates can have a significant impact on the outcome of an election.

2024 Election


The 2024 United States presidential election is a major political event that will determine the next president of the United States. This election is expected to be highly contested, with a number of key issues at stake.

Q&A

  • What is JD Vance's stance on the 2020 election and how does it relate to his potential role as a counter-revolutionary figure?

    JD Vance has repeatedly stated that he would not have certified the 2020 election results and believes that American institutions have been captured by \"godless, liberal, woke, Marxist, enemies of the people.\" This suggests a desire to overturn the existing order and restore a more traditional, conservative state, aligning him with a counter-revolutionary ideology.

  • How do the economic policies of the Biden-Harris administration and the Trump-Vance ticket compare?

    Both campaigns prioritize bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US, but they differ on other issues such as trade with China and the role of unions. The Biden-Harris administration has implemented policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and the Chips Science Act to incentivize domestic manufacturing, while the Trump-Vance ticket emphasizes a more nationalist and protectionist approach.

  • What are the key elements of JD Vance's immigration policy and how do they compare to past bipartisan approaches?

    Vance proposes deporting undocumented immigrants with criminal records and cracking down on employers who hire undocumented workers, which aligns with past bipartisan efforts. However, his avoidance of the issue of family separation and his claims about the impact of immigration on housing costs raise concerns about his true intentions and the potential for cruelty in a Trump-Vance administration.

  • What is JD Vance's stance on healthcare policy and how does it relate to the Affordable Care Act?

    Vance claims that Donald Trump saved Obamacare, despite Trump's repeated attempts to repeal it. He supports a system that would discriminate between healthy and sick people, which is a discredited idea that would likely lead to higher costs and fewer people being insured. This suggests that a second Trump administration would not prioritize healthcare reform and could potentially undermine the Affordable Care Act.

  • What is the Republican Party's stance on paid family leave and childcare and how does it compare to the Democratic Party's approach?

    JD Vance has signaled support for a family care model that promotes choice and flexibility for families, particularly in terms of childcare and paid family leave. This contrasts with the Democratic Party's focus on universal childcare programs. However, it remains unclear whether the Republican Party is truly committed to this agenda and whether it would prioritize these issues in a future administration.

  • What is the significance of analyzing campaign finance reports in understanding the 2024 election?

    Campaign finance reports provide valuable insights into the sources of funding and expenditures for political campaigns. By analyzing these reports, we can understand the dynamics of the race, the influence of special interests, and the potential for corruption.

  • What is the role of the vice president in certifying election results and why is this particularly important in light of the 2020 election?

    The vice president, as president of the Senate, plays a crucial role in certifying the results of the presidential election. This role became particularly significant after the 2020 election, when some individuals attempted to overturn the results based on unsubstantiated claims of fraud.

  • How does JD Vance's belief that American institutions have been captured by "godless, liberal, woke, Marxist, enemies of the people" relate to his counter-revolutionary project?

    Vance's belief that American institutions have been corrupted by a "woke" agenda fuels his desire to overturn the existing order and restore a more traditional, conservative state. This aligns with a counter-revolutionary ideology that seeks to dismantle existing power structures and replace them with a new system.

  • What is the influence of groups like American Compass on JD Vance's thinking about the Republican Party's pro-family agenda?

    American Compass, a conservative think tank, advocates for a more nationalist and protectionist economic policy that aligns with Vance's views. Their influence on Vance's thinking is evident in his support for a family care model that promotes choice and flexibility for families, which aligns with their broader agenda of strengthening the family unit and promoting traditional values.

Show Notes

The most consequential and revealing exchange during the vice-presidential debate on Tuesday came toward the end, when JD Vance was asked whether he would seek to challenge this year’s election results. That one moment proved that he can’t be trusted with the office he seeks.

But the 85 minutes preceding that moment had a lot of interesting policy discussion, so we couldn’t resist talking about that, too.

This episode contains strong language.

Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by our senior editor, Claire Gordon. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones, with Aman Sahota. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.


Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The V.P. Debate Came Down to One Moment

The V.P. Debate Came Down to One Moment

New York Times Opinion