DiscoverStay Tuned with PreetInside the Jury Room (with Shari Seidman Diamond)
Inside the Jury Room (with Shari Seidman Diamond)

Inside the Jury Room (with Shari Seidman Diamond)

Update: 2024-06-034
Share

Digest

In this episode of Stay Tuned, Preet Barara delves into the intricacies of the jury system in the United States, a cornerstone of the American justice system. He sits down with Sherry Sideman Diamond, a renowned professor and researcher specializing in the jury process, to gain insights into the inner workings of jury deliberations. They discuss the rationale behind having lay people, ordinary citizens without legal expertise, serve as jurors in criminal cases. Professor Diamond emphasizes the democratic nature of this system, highlighting how jurors reflect the values and perspectives of the community. The conversation then shifts to the practical aspects of jury deliberations, exploring the different approaches jurors take, including the use of straw polls and evidence-driven discussions. Professor Diamond sheds light on the common misconception that jury deliberations are akin to the dramatic portrayal in "12 Angry Men," emphasizing that while disagreements and tensions can arise, deliberations are generally respectful and focused on reaching a consensus. The episode also delves into the complexities of jury selection, examining the challenges of identifying ideal jurors and the potential impact of having lawyers on the jury. Professor Diamond shares her insights on common mistakes made by lawyers during jury selection and trial presentation, emphasizing the importance of providing jurors with a clear timeline of events and utilizing compelling evidence, such as audio recordings. The discussion concludes with a reflection on the unpredictability of trial outcomes, highlighting the inherent complexities of the jury system and the importance of maintaining a democratic process where the outcome is not predetermined.

Outlines

00:00:00
Summer Hits and the Making of a Summer Hit Series

This Chapter introduces the episode's focus on the making of summer hits, specifically highlighting Billy Eilish's new record and Charlie Puth's new single. The episode also mentions a series dedicated to exploring the creation of summer hits, featuring Charlie Harding, co-host of Switched On Pop.

00:00:51
The Trump Trial Verdict and the Jury System

This Chapter delves into the recent conviction of Donald Trump on charges of falsifying business records, emphasizing the significance of the jury's role in reaching this historic verdict. The discussion explores the essential function of juries in the justice system, highlighting their role as representatives of the community and their responsibility for impartial decision-making.

00:01:41
The Importance of Lay People in Jury Duty

This Chapter examines the rationale behind having lay people, ordinary citizens without legal expertise, serve as jurors in criminal cases. Professor Diamond emphasizes the democratic nature of this system, highlighting how jurors reflect the values and perspectives of the community. The discussion also explores alternative systems, such as mixed tribunals, but ultimately concludes that lay people bring a valuable common sense understanding and diverse range of experiences to the justice system.

00:06:49
Inside the Jury Room: Dynamics and Deliberations

This Chapter delves into the dynamics of jury deliberations, exploring the different approaches jurors take, including the use of straw polls and evidence-driven discussions. Professor Diamond sheds light on the common misconception that jury deliberations are akin to the dramatic portrayal in "12 Angry Men," emphasizing that while disagreements and tensions can arise, deliberations are generally respectful and focused on reaching a consensus.

Keywords

Jury
A group of people sworn to give a verdict in a legal case, typically consisting of 12 members in criminal cases. Juries are a cornerstone of the American justice system, representing the community and ensuring impartial decision-making.

Jury Deliberations
The process by which jurors discuss the evidence presented at trial and reach a verdict. Deliberations can involve various approaches, including straw polls, evidence-driven discussions, and respectful debate. The goal is to reach a unanimous decision, though in some cases, a majority verdict may be acceptable.

Jury Instructions
Guidelines provided by the judge to the jury outlining the legal principles and standards they must apply when reaching a verdict. Jury instructions are crucial for ensuring that jurors understand the law and apply it correctly in their deliberations.

Jury Selection
The process of choosing jurors for a trial. Lawyers for both sides have the opportunity to question potential jurors and challenge those they believe may be biased or unsuitable. The goal is to assemble a jury that is impartial and capable of rendering a fair verdict.

Jury Nullification
A situation where a jury, despite finding a defendant guilty based on the evidence, chooses to acquit them based on their own moral or ethical beliefs. Jury nullification is a controversial concept, as it allows jurors to disregard the law in certain circumstances.

Donald Trump
The 45th President of the United States, a controversial figure known for his business dealings, political career, and public statements. Trump was recently convicted on charges of falsifying business records, a case that has drawn significant public attention and raised questions about the role of juries in high-profile trials.

Sherry Sideman Diamond
A leading expert on the jury process, Professor Diamond is a professor at the Pritzker School of Law at Northwestern and a research professor at the American Bar Foundation. She has conducted extensive research on jury behavior, deliberations, and the impact of jury selection.

Preet Barara
A former United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Barara is a legal commentator and podcast host known for his insightful analysis of legal and political issues. He hosts the podcast "Stay Tuned" where he interviews experts and discusses current events.

Q&A

  • Why is it important to have lay people, ordinary citizens, serve as jurors in criminal cases?

    Professor Diamond argues that having lay people serve as jurors is essential for a democratic justice system. They bring a common sense understanding and a diverse range of experiences to the process, reflecting the values and perspectives of the community.

  • What are some common approaches that jurors take during deliberations?

    Jurors may begin with a straw poll to gauge initial opinions, but best practice is to be evidence-driven, reviewing the evidence and determining what happened before deciding on a verdict. While initial votes may occur, they often get derailed by questions or discussions about evidence or instructions.

  • How do lawyers make mistakes during jury selection and trial presentation?

    Professor Diamond highlights the difficulty of predicting how someone will decide a case. Common mistakes include relying on gender and race as predictors of juror behavior, failing to provide a clear timeline of events for jurors, and neglecting to use compelling evidence like audio recordings.

  • What is jury nullification and how often does it occur?

    Jury nullification happens when a jury finds a defendant guilty based on the evidence but chooses to acquit them based on their own moral or ethical beliefs. It's a rare occurrence, as jurors are generally obligated to convict if they believe the defendant is guilty of the charged crimes.

  • Why is it difficult to predict trial outcomes?

    Predicting trial outcomes assumes a clear understanding of how the trial will unfold, but surprises can occur, such as unexpected witness testimony. Additionally, the public only sees a portion of the trial, not the full picture presented to the jury, including deliberations, which can influence the final verdict.

Show Notes

Shari Seidman Diamond is one of the country’s foremost experts on the jury deliberations process. A professor at the Pritzker School of Law at Northwestern and a research professor at the American Bar Foundation, she joins Preet to discuss the Trump jury, the psychology of juror decision-making, and how juries promote impartiality. 


Note: This conversation was recorded on Thursday, May 30th, shortly before the Trump jury reached its verdict. 


Stay Tuned in Brief is presented by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Please write to us with your thoughts and questions at letters@cafe.com, or leave a voicemail at 669-247-7338.


For analysis of recent legal news, join the CAFE Insider community. Head to cafe.com/insider to join for just $1 for the first month. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Comments 
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Inside the Jury Room (with Shari Seidman Diamond)

Inside the Jury Room (with Shari Seidman Diamond)

CAFE